This isn't a retraction, and since they're leaving it up on their site, are they expecting something interesting to come out once they and everyone else is through with it? Two possibilities as I see it. One, that
Rolling Stone is just playing the part of courageous journalism and sticking with the story till it implodes once and for all. Or, two, that they expect something to come out which will redeem the story at least on some level and allow them to say they were correct all along. I guess we'll see.
No comments:
Post a Comment