Mayer and Farrow Sinatra Allen are on the case for the New Yorker, but that's not anywhere near enough, because if the Dems don't force Trump to rescind the nomination this week, Flake, Collins, Murkowski, and the rest of the bowel movement conservatives in the Senate will force confirmation along party lines.
THE POINT of the week of investigation was not the investigation itself, which would be a complete fucking sham regardless, but instead making sure the Dems had the time to expose all of Kavanaugh's lies in all of his hearings and to bring out all the other vile and embarrassing shit about him in a concerted effort to destroy him properly.
The Dems should have immediately engaged a unified and tightly coordinated effort to shine a light on the wondrous totality of Kavanaugh's lies before the committee and to corroborate the crimes in his past and beat the nominee over the head with all of it in public.
First, a Senator or two should have been everywhere with film at 11 of Dr. Ford's testimony, talking both about her rock-solid identification of Kavanaugh as her assailant as well as Kavanaugh and Judge laughing at her as they abused her. Great stuff if you want to defeat Kavanaugh, and the Senators should have been happy and proud to be defending such a wonderful, brave woman and witness. He lied about attempted rape.
Second and just as important, another Senator should be pushing the questions regarding Kavanaugh's finances and his magic disappearing debt. He lied about his debt and his finances and who paid for his house.
At the same time, a very nice, kindly Senator should be shocked, just shocked at Kavanaugh's ghastly behavior in front of the committee and talking about all of it to anyone in the media who will listen. He lied about his motivation and his qualifications.
Then, getting the real fun rolling, another Senator should be discussing the 1 July calendar, telling everyone it is the corroboration of Dr. Ford's story and the roles of the friends, especially Gaudette and Garrett. Was his calendar a lie? Or is it the truth?
One Senator should be talking non-stop about Mark Judge and asking how his role relates to the 1 July question above. Why did Mark Judge lie? What is Mark Judge hiding on behalf of Bart O'Kavanaugh?
At the same time, a different Senator should be talking about Chris Garrett and his relationships with Kavanaugh and Ford as well as his part in the Ed Whelan fabrication. Did Kavanaugh help Whelan lie about Squi?
Another Senator should be focused on the roles of the other boys on the calendar. Are they lying now?
Renate Alumni and the rest of the ffffffffucking drinking and rapey shit in the yearbook could easily be the stuff a young-ish Senator tackles; Cory Booker loves to preen, so he'd be perfect. Why did Kavanaugh lie about Renate? What does she think of this horrible violation, Senator Booker?
One Senator each should be publicizing the allegations of Ramirez and Swetnick. Why did Kavanaugh lie about what happened to these women?
Another Senator should be spreading the stories of the Yale people who say Kavanaugh lied about his drinking and asking why these people have not already been interviewed by the FBI. Why did he lie about his drinking problem?
A Senator should be publicizing the story of Mark Judge's college girlfriend, Elizabeth Rasor, who has corroboration of Swetnick's allegation. Why didn't Kavanaugh tell the truth?
Another Senator should have been given a friendly prosecutor to refute all the bullshit Rachel Mitchell told the Republicans AND highlight the fact that Mitchell was fired from the hearing after she brought up the 1 July corroboration of Dr. Ford's story. Why was Kavanaugh unable to face the same prosecutor during the hearing that Dr. Ford did?
Some Senator with tenure like Leahy should be talking non-stop about Kavanaugh's work with Ken Starr, the vile things he wanted to ask poor Monica Lewinsky, Kavanaugh's part in the Brooks Brothers riot during the treasonous coup and theft of an election engineered by the bowel movement conservatives in 2000, and his highly insane and highly partisan conservatives views on women and their rights in society.
Next, a Senator, one not previously connected with this nomination--and maybe even a candidate or two--should be out pushing the idea that Kavanaugh and Clarence Uncle Thomas must be impeached once the Dems get control of Congress, AND that the next Dem president will add at least two justices to the court in order to counteract two generations of Republican malpractice on the SCOTUS. These are bad men who should not be allowed to harm the lives of decent, hardworking Americans. This transcends party and is about basic human decency. Surely no exceptional American patriot could support men as debased and destructive as Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Uncle Thomas.
Finally, a leading Senator on the committee, Feinstein if she's up to it, but she's probably not, but someone, maybe Klobuchar, should be constantly in front of the media and on Twitter, wrapping all these stories into a credible whole of a poor girl who was abused when she was 15 by a nasty little twerp who grew into a drunken, lying monster named Brett Kavanaugh. Just one lie would be enough to keep Kavanaugh off the court, but the lead Dem should be out there right now weaving this rich tapestry of lies and crimes for all the world to see.
All of this, any of it really, would have made Kavanaugh a toxic buffoon in front of America and an anchor around the necks of every Republican running for office in the next decade.
But they're not doing. Any. Of. It. Because they're Dems and they suck major ass.
No comments:
Post a Comment