aspirant to the office of fluffer-in-chief (internet district) scott lemieux bravely cites only political science texts supporting his position, contends he's only being reasonable, says evan bayh was a stalwart man of principle who could not be bought for a pittance or even appeal to his pathetic vanity, and shut-up! as i commented:
one thing the apologist axis pretends not to understand is the shallow vanity of the people involved. evan bayh? what leverage could obama have had over such a piece of human filth? certainly bayh and politicians like him have been rock-ribbed defenders of principle throughout history and could never be pressured on anything. yeah, that’s it.
No comments:
Post a Comment